Product details

By continuing to use our site you consent to the use of cookies as described in our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.
You can change your cookie settings at any time but parts of our site will not function correctly without them.

Abstract

This is the second of a three-case series. The group that met at Land Information New Zealand (LINZ) in mid-October 2005 faced a formidable challenge. After six months of meetings there were 122 different projects proposed, each scoped and defined by technical experts. Now everyone had to set aside personal preferences and decide which of those projects should take priority. This Part (B) case can be used to continue discussion of collaborative activity, or it can be used as a stand-alone case for discussion of multi-criteria decision analysis.

About

Abstract

This is the second of a three-case series. The group that met at Land Information New Zealand (LINZ) in mid-October 2005 faced a formidable challenge. After six months of meetings there were 122 different projects proposed, each scoped and defined by technical experts. Now everyone had to set aside personal preferences and decide which of those projects should take priority. This Part (B) case can be used to continue discussion of collaborative activity, or it can be used as a stand-alone case for discussion of multi-criteria decision analysis.

Related